年金引き下げ “憲法に違反せず”最高裁判断 各地裁判に影響か
[ad_1]
法律の改正に伴い年金の支給額が段階的に引き下げられたことに対し、兵庫県の年金受給者95人が「最低限度の生活を保障する憲法に違反する」として取り消しを求めた裁判で、最高裁判所は「憲法に違反しない」と判断して上告を退ける判決を言い渡しました。全国各地で起こされている同様の訴訟に影響を与える可能性があります。
in English
Following the amendment of the law, the amount of pension payments was gradually reduced, leading to a lawsuit where 95 pension recipients in Hyogo Prefecture sought to have the reduction revoked, claiming that it violated the constitutional guarantee of a minimum standard of living. The Supreme Court ruled that it did not violate the constitution and rejected the appeal. This decision may have an impact on similar lawsuits taking place across the country.
in Germany
As a result of the gradual reduction in pension payments due to the revision of the law, 95 pension recipients in Hyogo Prefecture sought to have their payments revoked, claiming that it violated the constitutional guarantee of a minimum standard of living. In a ruling, the Supreme Court rejected the appeal, stating that it did not violate the constitution. This decision may have implications for similar lawsuits taking place across the country.
[ad_2]
Source link